Using Linux IMA with OSTree
Linux IMA
The Linux Integrity Measurement Architecture provides a mechanism to cryptographically sign the digest of a regular file, and policies can be applied to e.g. require that code executed by the root user have a valid signed digest.
The alignment between Linux IMA and ostree is quite strong. OSTree provides a content-addressable object store, where files are intended to be immutable. This is implemented with a basic read-only bind mount.
While IMA does not actually prevent mutating files, any changed (or unsigned) files would (depending on policy) not be readable or executable.
IMA signatures and OSTree checksum
Mechanically, IMA signatures appear as a security.ima
extended attribute
on the file. This is a signed digest of just the file content (and not
any metadata)
OSTree’s checksums in contrast include not just the file content, but also metadata such as uid, gid and mode and extended attributes;
Together, this means that adding an IMA signature to a file in the OSTree model appears as a new object (with a new digest). A nice property is that this enables the transactional addition (or removal) of IMA signatures. However, adding IMA signatures to files that were previously unsigned also today duplicates disk space.
Signing
To apply IMA signatures to an OSTree commit, there is an ima-sign
command implemented currently in the ostree-rs-ext
project.
Generating a key
There is documentation for this in man evmctl
and the upstream IMA
page; we will not replicate it here.
Signing a commit
ima-sign
requires 4 things:
- An OSTree repository (could be any mode;
archive
or e.g.bare-user
) - A ref or commit digest (e.g.
exampleos/x86_64/stable
) - A digest algorithm (usually
sha256
, but you may use e.g.sha512
as well) - An RSA private key
You can then add IMA signatures to all regular files in the commit:
$ ostree-ext-cli ima-sign --repo=repo exampleos/x86_64/stable sha256 /path/to/key.pem
Many different choices are possible for the signing model. For example,
your build system could store individual components/packages in their own
ostree refs, and sign them at build time. This would avoid re-signing
all binaries when creating production builds. Although note you
still likely want to sign generated artifacts from unioning individual
components, such as a dpkg/rpm database or equivalent and cache files
such as the ldconfig
and GTK+ icon caches, etc.
Applying a policy
Signing a commit by itself will have little to no effect. You will also need to include in your builds an IMA policy.
Linux EVM
The EVM subsystem builds on IMA, and adds another signature which covers most file data, such as the uid, gid and mode and selected security-relevant extended attributes.
This is quite close to the ostree native checksum - the ordering of the fields is different so the checksums are physically different, but logically they are very close.
However, the focus of the EVM design seems to mostly
be on machine-specific signatures with keys stored in a TPM.
Note that doing this on a per-machine basis would add a new
security.evm
extended attribute, and crucially that
changes the ostree digest - so from ostree’s perspective,
these objects will appear corrupt.
In the future, ostree may learn to ignore the presence of security.evm
extended attributes.
There is also some support for “portable” EVM signatures - by default, EVM signatures also include the inode number and generation which are inherently machine-specific.
A future ostree enhancement may instead also focus on supporting signing commits with these “portable” EVM signatures in addition to IMA.
Further references
- https://sourceforge.net/p/linux-ima/wiki/Home/
- https://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Ima_evm
- https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Integrity_Measurement_Architecture
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Signed_RPM_Contents
- https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/8/html/managing_monitoring_and_updating_the_kernel/enhancing-security-with-the-kernel-integrity-subsystem_managing-monitoring-and-updating-the-kernel